Dabi Roy লেবেলটি সহ পোস্টগুলি দেখানো হচ্ছে৷ সকল পোস্ট দেখান
Dabi Roy লেবেলটি সহ পোস্টগুলি দেখানো হচ্ছে৷ সকল পোস্ট দেখান

মঙ্গলবার, ৪ জুন, ২০১৯

The Hungryalist Movement : Shikha Kumar

The Age of Dissent

Shikha Kumar

How the Hungry Movement of Bengal in the 60s mirrored the Beat Generation
The Hungryalists: The Poets Who Sparked a Revolution | Maitreyee Bhattacharjee Chowdhury | Viking | 187 Pages | Rs 599
‘RARELY HAVE POETRY movements around the world impacted generations of writers, intellectuals and thinkers in the way these two movements have. In that sense, it is also the narrative of an entire generation,’ writes Maitreyee Bhattacharjee Chowdhury in the introduction to The Hungryalists, referring to America’s Beat Generation and India’s Hungry Movement.
The Hungryalists were born on a rainy night in Patna in 1961. Formed by brothers Malay and Samir Roy Choudhury, Shakti Chatterjee and Haradhan Dhara (a Dalit writer who went by his adopted name Debi Rai), the movement was joined by other poets and artists subsequently, sparking a sociocultural revolution of sorts in postcolonial Bengal. Against the backdrop of rising unemployment, political unrest and migration from East Pakistan, the Hungryalists’ poetry rejected the literary aristocracy of Calcutta.
Chowdhury follows the narrative non-fiction format to recreate the generation’s chronicles in the 60s, their stories culled from personal interviews, memoirs, journals and other books. She also gives plenty of political and historical context to establish how the Hungryalists’ works unshackled readers’ perceptions of what literature was.
‘For the Western-educated bhadralok Bengali of Calcutta, the very presence of the refugees was a scar on their private and intellectual landscape and reason enough to feel ruffled. An entire generation of Dalits suddenly became ‘refugees’, or the refugees became the new Dalit,’ she writes.
The Hungry bulletin began being published from Haradhan’s tiny room in a slum in Calcutta. Its first manifesto had his adopted name as editor, and his slum address for official correspondence, in what was ‘a deliberate move to offend the conservative elite custodians of culture’.
There’s also a parallel narrative of Allen Ginsberg’s travels in India with his long-term partner and fellow poet Peter Orlovsky in the 60s. A proponent of the Beat Generation, Ginsberg—like many Americans looking to escape the traps of a consumerist lifestyle—found himself lured by the spiritualism that surrounded India. He spent significant time with the Hungry poets in Patna, Varanasi and Calcutta.
As their popularity grew, members of the Hungry group also started their own magazines, encouraging younger voices. The bulletin became more inclusive too—two of the members, Subimal and Rajkamal, published a trilingual (Bangla, Hindi, English) edition. Apart from critiquing politics and religion, the ‘Bhookhi Peedhi’ soon became infamous for their poetry celebrating the sensuous, at a time when the expression of physical desires was considered taboo in literature: ‘They introduced the idea that obscenity was a social and artificial construct, created by class-conscious people.’
In May 1964, a 16-page Hungry manifesto included a poem by Malay, titled ‘Prachanda Baidyutik Chhutar’ (translated into English as ‘Stark Electric Jesus’) and addressed to a fictional lover. The poem, with its raw emotion and overt references to sex, created a stir. By September, arrest warrants had been issued against 11 of the Hungry poets, including Malay, Samir and Debi.
The Hungryalists got international attention when Time featured their revolution. More coverage from Latin America, Europe, Australia and the US followed. But the movement’s gusto started dwindling after the arrests—their morale was broken and Malay came to realise that ‘a revolution was pointless when betrayal came from deep within’. Shakti had left the group a few years earlier, and testified against them in court. Malay was acquitted in 1967, and there were many failed attempts to regroup in the years after.
With the Naxal uprisings, the state government began taking extreme steps to rein in the rebellious. While the Hungryalist Movement ended, most of the poets never stopped writing or editing until their death.

সোমবার, ৮ এপ্রিল, ২০১৯

The Hungryalists by Maitreyee B Chowdhury

The Hungry Poets

By Maitreyee B Chowdhury 
In a city roiled by poverty, immigration, violence and the energy of youthful anger, a new generation of writers staked their claim, says Maitreyee B Chowdhury

In October 1962, young poet Malay Roy Choudhury boarded the newly launched Janata Express at Patna. The train would stop in Delhi before it reached Calcutta—a rather tedious journey that would go on for over two days. Malay hoped Calcutta would be pleasant this time of the year. His elder brother, Samir, had written to him just before he had left for Calcutta. You’ll reach just in time to see the city being decorated for Durga Puja. Ma arrives in the most beautiful colours and people make the most creative podiums for her to be worshipped in. The kashphool would have spread its abundance. You’ll find them everywhere if you care to look, spread out sleepily in the emptiness outside the city. The sound of dhak will be everywhere and if you’re lucky, you’ll find some of the dhakis at the Howrah station when you arrive. Malay wondered if Calcutta had changed Samir. Patna was dry and without a trace of chill. The narrow seats and the stale air that greeted him in the third-class compartment were terrifying. He was carrying two small bags, his underwear peeking out of one, some papers and a few packets of crisps from the other. It was still early evening, with reluctant bogies idly basking in a gentle sun. It was Malay’s first trip to Calcutta after the establishment of the Hungry Generation.

Before the year would end, Malay would meet American poet Allen Ginsberg in Calcutta. It was February 1961 when Ginsberg landed in Bombay. A nuclear face-off had just been averted in Cuba and Delhi was at loggerheads with Peking—a border dispute had pushed the two countries to the brink of war. And just like everywhere else, poets, writers and thinkers in India too were affected by these events.
City for Poets | Calcutta ca. 1945
City for Poets | Calcutta ca. 1945

Ginsberg visited many places in the country, including Benares, Patna, the Himalayan foothills and Calcutta. During his trip, he spent most of his time mingling with like-minded poets, musicians and artists, and later wrote about them in great detail in his Indian Journals. In Calcutta, between keeping company with Ashok Fakir in ‘Ganja Park’—an area near the main road stretching from Chowringhee to Rashbehari Avenue—and hallucinating at Kali’s feet while lying in her temples, Ginsberg would walk around the city or watch bodies being burned in the ghats. To the ever-sceptical Bengali, he might have seemed like just another disillusioned westerner doing the rounds of holy Indian cities, in search of drugs, sex and ‘exotic’ spirituality. Not many Indians at the time were aware of Ginsberg’s reputation or the influence he wielded back home. Ginsberg, of course, had read ‘Howl’, his legendary poem, at Six Gallery in San Francisco by then, and had begun shaping the American approach and reaction to poetry. What effect his presence would have on the poets in Calcutta, or they on him, time would tell vividly. But for now, he was one of them—a poet and a wanderer, who carried with him a turbulent and disturbed past, with the belief that here, of all places, he would be accepted no matter how dirty or disillusioned he was.

The train moved slowly, as if struggling with a natural inclination for inertia. Malay remembered what Samir had written to him from Calcutta while he was in Patna. He had been angry with their father for sending him away to Calcutta after school. The Roy Choudhurys had decided to move from Imlitala, their Patna neighbourhood, which their father considered a bad influence on the boys. Pretty early on in life, the place had exposed them to free sex, toddy, ganja, and much more. Their father had built a new house in Dariapur and the family had shifted there. Subsequently, when Samir was sent to Calcutta, it was a double blow for him, to be removed at once from Imlitala and his family. Calcutta was a city he knew almost nothing about. His instructions to Malay had been clear—he was going to live vicariously through his brother in Patna. On certain days, Samir would almost be pleading with Malay in his letters.
Fraternity (Standing, from left) Saileshwar Ghosh, Malay Roychoudhury, Subhash Ghosh; (seated) Subimal Basak, David, Basudeb Dasgupta
Fraternity: (Standing, from left) Saileshwar Ghosh, Malay Roychoudhury, Subhash Ghosh; (seated) Subimal Basak, David, Basudeb Dasgupta
Dear Malay,

Near the chariali next to our house is a woman who sells bidis for two annas. Buy a packet from her, hide it in your trunk and bring it for me when you’re in Calcutta. Remember, nobody should know about this.
Dada
And another about a month later read:

Dear Malay,
Apparently, there are many things to do here, but I don’t know where to start. I have made a few friends; we meet at the Coffee House regularly. Deepak [Majumdar], Ananda [Bagchi] and Sunil [Ganguly] are close to me. Sometimes we discuss kobita [poetry], at other times, it is the state of affairs. Everyone is angry here; there are strange people I meet on the road. Theyare not like the poor of Imlitala; they have a lost look about them. They don’t look or feel poor when you talk to them—all you can understand is death on the inside. I think they have lost a dream. It makes me feel horrible; I miss the easy poverty of Imlitala . . . You must go to Bade Miyan’s paan shop at the end of our lane and tell him about the paan that I used to have, hewill know. You could have one yourself, but I fear it might not be good for you. You must bring one for me though. It will cost you one anna.
Dada

Malay could not understand from Samir’s letters whether he was happy in Calcutta or not. But he sensed some anger. He seemed like a revolutionary without an understanding of what his revolt was about. Malay wished Samir knew how much he wanted to see Calcutta—this city where poems were read aloud on the streets; where a Shankha Ghosh, even at the height of his literary career, could be approached by college students; where Shakti Chatterjee would recite poetry on the stairs of the Coffee House. Samir’s shift to Calcutta indirectly helped Malay in many ways. It was Ashadh of 1952 when Malay next received a letter from Samir. It had been raining for two days and the blue inland envelope was wet when Malay fetched it from the letterbox. Unlike his previous letters, Samir sounded excited in this one—it was the first time he had forgotten to mention Imlitala.
Dear Malay, 

Last evening, Sunil, Shakti and Deepak came home. My room is small, and the bed has too many books on it for me to move them. We sat on the terrace adjoining my chilekothar [an attic-like room]. While it didn’t matter to either Sunil or Deepak, I was glad I had the small mat Ma had insisted I bring from Patna. Tha’mma doesn’t stir out of her room after dusk, so it was OK for Sunil to bring his smoke. Thanks to the gondhoraj lebu plant that is full of flowers and small bulbs of lemons, the smell of smoke was confined to the terrace. We talked for a long time; thankfully, none of them were in a hurry. Tha’mma might ask a lot of questions tomorrow though. Sunil is full of ideas; he says he wants to start a magazine. He is still not sure how to go about it though, but he says he is bored of reading the same kind of writing. I told him what you and I have talked about so many times. He seemed a bit surprised at first, and then asked me about you. Deepak was quiet all evening, but he sang a song later. Kaka came up to meet us. Later, he and Deepak talked about Hindi film heroines. Their discussion made Shakti and me laugh a lot. There was not much to eat, but Sunil had bought some pakoras on the way; we ate them and, later, licked the plate clean. Sunil went through my books and wanted the [Victorian poet, Algernon Charles] Swinburne collection. I can give it to him only later, which is what I told him. I hope he didn’t take offence though.
More later,
Dada 

Many new writers were Samir’s classmates in City College. There were other established ones, Coffee House regulars, whom Samir had befriended and would discuss literature with. Shakti and Sunil came up quite often; they were close friends, who had been to his family home in Uttorpara a few times. Sunil was a prolific and acclaimed novelist, but poetry was his first love. Indeed, Samir, who’d recognized his talent early on, went on to fund and publish Sunil’s first book of poems, Eka Ebong Koyekjon. Samir would have intense discussions with Deepak, Sunil and Shakti on many an evening on the kind of literature they had all grown up with and began to believe in. Subsequently, he got deeply involved with Sunil in establishing Krittibhash—a journal that launched many a Bengali poet at that time. Deepak, Ananda and Shakti were also compatriots in this venture. Krittibhash found its voice in 1953. Samir always kept his brother in the loop, and Malay would occasionally receive large paper packets containing literary periodicals and books of poetry. Now as the train moved towards Calcutta, Malay felt as if his life was coming full circle. It had been a strange decision to visit the city at a time when post-Partition vomit and excreta were splattered on Calcutta streets. Marked by communal violence, anger and unemployment, the streets smelled of hunger and disillusionment. Riots were still raging. The wound of a land divided lingered, refugees from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) continued to arrive in droves. And since they did not know where to go, they occupied the pavements, laced the streets with their questions, frustrations and a deep need to be recognised as more than an inconvenient presence on tree-lined avenues. The feeling of being uprooted was everywhere. Political leaders decided that the second phase of five-year planning needed to see the growth of heavy industries. The land required for such industries necessitated the evacuation of farmers. Forced off their ancestral land and in the absence of a proper rehabilitation plan, those evicted wandered aimlessly around the cities—refugees by another name.

Calcutta had assumed different dimensions in Malay’s mind. The smell of the Hooghly wafted across Victoria Memorial and settled like an unwanted cow on its lawns. Unsung symphonies spilled out of St Paul’s Cathedral on lonely nights; white gulls swooped in on grey afternoons and looked startling against the backdrop of the rain-swept edifice. In a few years, Naxalbari would become a reality, but not yet. Like an infant Kali with bohemian fantasies, Calcutta and its literature sprouted a new tongue—that of the Hungry Generation. Malay, like Samir and many others, found himself at the helm of this madness, and poetry seemed to lick his body and soul in strange colours. As a reassurance of such a huge leap of faith, Shakti had written to Samir:

Bondhu Samir,
We had begun by speaking of an undying love for literature, when we suddenly found ourselves in a dream. A dream that is bigger than us, and one that will exist in its capacity of right and wrong and beyond that of our small worlds.
Bhalobashajuriye
Shakti 

Malay in Nepal
Malay in Nepal

Patna, October 1961. Shakti and Haradhan Dhara met Samir and Malay at the brothers’ newly built house. Evening crept stealthily on to their shoulders and sat still there. The Roy Choudhurys were still in a transitional frame of mind. The brothers had not forgotten Imlitala—its terrific chaos, the shadows of their childhood and their small house. The new house in Dariapur on Abdul Bari Road looked spick and span, and stupid. “Not a house for me, not for me!” Malay would shout at the walls. But their father would have none of it—in his vision for his family, Imlitala was a matter of the past. Nearby, in Rajendra Nagar, lived Hindi writers Phanishwar Nath Renu and Ramdhari Singh Dinkar. They belonged to the Nayi Kahani and Uttar Chhaya Wadi movements respectively—groups that believed in largely individualistic, urbanistic and self-conscious aesthetics. While Renu was critically acclaimed as among the most powerful and brilliant writers of his time, Dinkar had a huge impact on readers of Hindi poetry. He went on to become a renowned poet of national standing. His poetry, a precursor to the A-Kavita movement, would later emerge in the sixties as a contemporary influence, inspired in some ways by Ginsberg and the Beat journey. Samir’s regular interactions with them would leave a deep impact on his thinking and mould his poetry in the future. Sometime later, Dinkar, who belonged to the community of Bhumihars, would abandon his caste to make an important statement on caste politics.

It was nine in the evening; dinner was over. None of them had ventured out all day. Malay insisted that Shakti visit Imlitala with him: “I miss Naseem Apa—her fragrant hair, the curve of her back, the way she ran after I kissed her hazaar times in the shadow of the imam. Shakti, come with me to see her, won’t you?” Shakti was overwhelmed by the romanticism of a ghetto being named after a tree. He had been eager to see the imli tree after which Imlitala was named. “Will there be an enactment of Radha–Krishna’s sharad purnima rasa dance?” he asked. “Did the imli tree have a golden wall after the legend of Krishna turning a golden hue while searching for his beloved Radha, who had disappeared in between their dance?” Malay was amused. He had not witnessed any religion in Imlitala. Everyone born there was sworn to poverty, their only allegiance was to the mad dance of filth around them. He told Shakti, “Would you like to read your poetry during the Imlitala fest? Small-time thieves, prostitutes and roadside urchins make up the audience. Women in pink blouses and green petticoats sit down with their men to have country liquor, one hip bent on another, and with dirty hands touch each other. Some love will flow, some lust too. You’ll need a different lens to be able to see this poetry.” Samir sounded a warning that the police might be there too. “Wherever poetry is, the dogs follow,” Malay quipped. A round of laughter followed.

Excerpted from The Hungryalists, forthcoming from Penguin India. Published in the Jan-Mar 2019 issue.



শনিবার, ১৬ মার্চ, ২০১৯

Maitreyee B Chowdhury talks to Torsa Ghosal about her book "The Hungryalists"

The hungry and the restless

Torsa Ghosal

Outside the lines: Refugees from erstwhile East Pakistan flee the 1971 war. Binoy Majumdar, a prominent member of the Hungryalists, was also a refugee who was often overlooked by the literary establishment in Bengal   -  THE HINDU ARCHIVES

A new book chronicles the Hungryalist poets, who revitalised Bengali literature during the turbulent 1960s

 
Maitreyee Bhattacharjee Chowdhury’s The Hungryalists: The Poets Who Sparked A Revolution offers a compelling portrait of poets such as Malay Roy Choudhury, Shakti Chattopadhyay, Samir Roychoudhury, Haradhan Dhara and Binoy Majumdar, who initiated the “Hungry Movement” to revitalise Bengali literature during the 1960s.

It was a turbulent period marked by the influx of refugees from East Bengal, the Indo-China War, the Vietnam war, and the Naxalite uprising. The Hungry Generation of poets responded to the on-going national and international turmoil, though as a group they were never quite a cohesive entity. Chattopadhyay, for instance, left the group in the mid-sixties.

Around the same time, Roy Choudhury and Dhara, along with several other Hungryalists, were held for writing “obscene” poetry. Chattopadhyay accepted a Sahitya Akademi Award in 1983. Roy Choudhury was conferred the same honour in 2003 but he refused to accept it.
Given their anti-establishment sensibilities, the Hungryalists had befriended the iconic post-war American poets, the Beats, including Allen Ginsberg and Peter Orlovsky, who were touring India at the time. The most striking feature of The Hungryalists is that though it records this significant chapter of literary history, it does so by tracing the rich internal lives of the poets — their motivations, dreams, and disappointments.

Excerpts from an interview with the author:
What drew you to the Hungry Generation?
About four years ago I read Deborah Baker’s book A Blue Hand: The Beats in India, where I found a fleeting mention of the Hungryalists. Like me, many in Bengal had heard of the Hungry Andolan and read them in Bangla but no substantial work had been done on them in English. This was when I began my research on them.

Early into the writing, I felt that narrating their dreams and disappointments was necessary because poetry wasn’t only a way of life; for them, it was life.

Since you are a poet, was it challenging for you to focus on the poets’ biographies rather than on their poetry?
As a poet and non-fiction writer, this was in fact the perfect combination. Being a poet probably made me understand their choices in life and revolt better. The Hungryalists’ fight was against elitism, casteism and authoritarianism. The sixties were a time during which any kind of sensuality in poetry or other writing was looked down upon. Buddhadeb Bose’s book Raat Bhor Brishti which released around this time was banned, copies were burnt and he was put on trial standing in a wired cage. While such a response might have been shocking in the’60s, these subjects resonate with writers such as myself too.

Why made you draw parallels between the Beats and the Hungryalists?
There have been too many comparisons between the Beats and the Hungryalists, as a result of which the Hungryalists are somewhat defensive about acknowledging the influence of the Beats. The fact remains, however, that the two groups shared a tremendous love for a new kind of poetry which joined them at the hip, in a manner of speaking. Also, the Hungryalists did mingle with the Beats, read their work, and accepted their help when necessary. While the parallels make for a great narrative and situate the Hungryalists’ revolt in an international context, there is also no doubt that the Hungryalists were poor Bengali writers with no great financial support, which is why their rebellion against elitism, classism, casteism and negation of sensuality in literature was crushed so easily.

The Hungryalists identified as outsiders, and you consider their condition as analogous to those of the refugees from East Bengal and Dalits. Could you elaborate on the analogies?
The Hungryalists came about because some of them, such as Haradhan Dhara, were Dalit writers ignored by the literati, others like Binoy Majumdar were refugees and still others like Malay were probasi Bengali writers — they were already social misfits. Coming together as a group was the only way they would get any attention of the so-called ‘cultured society’.

The Hungryalists understood the consequences of shunning mainstream dictums and had, in many ways, begun feeling the heat of being socially shunned. They formally named themselves, inspired by Geoffrey Chaucer’s line, “In the sowre hungry tyme”. But they were, perhaps, unprepared for facing legal consequences. But they were, perhaps, unprepared for facing legal consequences.

While researching how the Hungryalists were tried for writing “obscene” poetry, did you feel an event like that would pan out any differently today?
While writing about sexuality might be more acceptable today than it was in the ’60s, people are still wary of reading or reacting to anything outside their comfort zone. As far as tolerating another’s thought process is concerned, I feel people are still not as accepting. Where poetry and poets are concerned, I feel that people had more love for poets and poetry before. There was a certain sense of awe associated with poets because they presented the world from an altogether different perspective. The fact that Malay had been arrested created a huge stir internationally, but when poet Binoy Majumdar died in poverty and mental trauma in 2006, how many people were aware of it?
The need for deep poetic introspection seems mostly lost, the realm of subtlety no longer exists, and though poetry is still popular, the magic of finding value in something that doesn’t have much monetary consequence is redundant.

Torsa Ghosal is the author of Open Couplets, and professor of English at California State University, Sacramento
 
Published on March 15, 2019
 

শনিবার, ৭ জুলাই, ২০১৮

These Four Founders of The Movement are known as "HUNGRYALIST QUARTET"

                                                             Malay Roychoudhury
                                                                          
                                                            Samir Roychoudhury
                                                                           
                                                            Shakti Chattopadhyay
                                                                          

                                                                  Debi Roy